The tension between individual responsibility and collective action is central to philosophy, even spirituality. This tension even found its way into our raw shibboleth some years ago, “Co-operatives for collective freedom. Bitcoin for individual liberty.”
From Jung’s individuation to Nietzsche’s self-overcoming, from Dostoyevsky’s moral struggles to Camus’ existential defiance, a common theme emerges: radical self-mastery. Ditto with Eckhart’s mysticism, Huxley’s perennial philosophy, Ram Dass’ emphasis on presence, and Krishnamurti’s call for freedom from conditioning.
Their works converge on this truth: the path to authenticity demands radical self-responsibility and the courage to transcend collective confines.
A cooperative may be a collective. But is it collectivist?
Dostoyevsky’s Ivan Karamazov agonizes over moral accountability without divine order, yet do cooperatives answer this by grounding responsibility in human reciprocity? Meister Eckhart’s mystical detachment, paradoxically, mirrors that: by surrendering ego to the collective, one achieves deeper individual agency.
Cooperatives echo Nietzsche’s Übermensch, who creates values through action. Here, members are not passive cogs but active stakeholders directly shaping common outcomes. Jung’s individuation—integrating the self—finds resonance in cooperatives, where personal growth intertwines with the communal.
A cooperative, much like Camus’ absurd hero embracing meaning in a chaotic world, allows individuals to forge purpose through shared labor, turning existential responsibility into collective force.
While Nietzsche and Camus emphasized solitary struggles, do cooperatives weave these into a tapestry of shared resilience?
While “collectivism” generally prioritizes the group over the individual, cooperatives balance individual agency and collective well-being. The cooperative model scales individual responsibility.
But as Krishnamurti suggests, true transformation begins with inner freedom—only then can one contribute meaningfully. Likewise, Ram Dass reminds us that service is most powerful when rooted in deep self-awareness.
Ultimately, radical self-maximization strengthens cooperation, and cooperatives offer a framework for applying personal authenticity toward common goals. Does this offer a path to both personal liberation and communal well-being?
The odd pairing between individualism and cooperation may be hiding in plain sight: self-help, self-reliance, self-responsibility.
When some may question if self-responsibility is at odds with cooperation,
The answer may be that the cooperative model doesn’t dilute individuality—it elevates it.
Thinkers, across eras and ideologies, reject the false binary of self vs. society. Cooperatives prove their wisdom: Nietzschean will meets Dostoyevskyan brotherhood; Eckhart’s detachment fuels Huxleyan innovation.
In cooperatives, radical self-maximization is not narcissism but a vow—to grow so fully that one’s light ignites others.
As Ram Dass taught, “We’re all just walking each other home.” The cooperative model, in its ideal form, is that walk made visible: a journey where responsibility is the bridge between “I” and “we.”
In the spirit of Camus, we might say: One must imagine Sisyphus happy—not alone, but pushing the boulder with others, each step a collective act of defiance and meaning.
#bitcoinforcooperatives
#cooperativesforbitcoin